By Sakis Moumtzis,
Who wouldn’t want Greece and Turkey to settle their differences and harness the hidden potential in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean amid an atmosphere of consensus?
It sounds as idealistic as achieving world peace, fostering international collaboration, and promoting love among people. However, regrettably, in practice, the situation is far more intricate, as there are significant disparities that divide the two countries. Even when it comes to acknowledging these differences, there is disagreement. While Greece may assert that it has only one difference with Turkey, such a claim holds no significance. Turkey, on the other hand, argues that there are additional differences at play. Consequently, the relations between these two nations are burdened by such procedural disagreements even before delving into the core of the problem.
Turkey adopts a revisionist approach. Its elites believe that their homeland is constrained by the international treaties set a century ago
On the contrary, Turkey adopts a revisionist approach. Its elites believe that their homeland is constrained by the international treaties set a century ago, and they strive to transcend this predicament by projecting their power.
Additionally, the Turkish side does not desire this course of action since their strategic argument – claiming that the islands lack a continental shelf – would collapse before the ICJ. Consequently, Turkey has every reason to undermine the relevant process from the outset. So, what kind of dialogue is the prime minister referring to? Evidently, he is expressing what he must, as it aligns with the desires of the international community and is dictated by Greece’s international status.
